Table of Contents
In 1964, the Supreme Court would hand down two cases, Wesberry v. Sanders and Reynolds v. Sims, which required the United States House of Representatives and state legislatures to establish electoral districts of equal population on the principle of one person, one vote.
What are the Baker v Carr factors?
The Court delineated a series of factors, at least one of which must be present, in order for the case to be a non-justiciable political question: (a) commitment of the issue to a branch of government other than the judiciary; (b) lack of standards for resolving the issue; (c) impossibility of the judiciary to resolve …
Who was the petitioner in Baker v Carr?
Residents were left feeling as though their votes were diluted. Plaintiff, and Shelby County resident, Charles Baker, alleged that he was denied equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment, and sued Joe Carr, Tennessee’s Secretary of State.
Which of the following was the ruling in Shaw v Reno 1993?
Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause.
Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v?
Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr? Tennessee had discriminated in favor of city voters over rural voters.
Why was Baker Vs Carr important?
This case made it possible for unrepresented voters to have their districts redrawn by federal courts, initiating a decade of lawsuits that would eventually result in a redrawing of the nation’s political map.
Why is the Baker v Carr case important?
Which of the following was the ruling in Shaw v Reno 1993 quizlet?
The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause.
Who was involved in the Baker v Carr case?
Carr (1962) Charles Baker, a resident of an urban neighborhood in Tennessee, filed suit in federal court against Joe Carr, then Secretary of State of Tennessee. Baker sought a court injunction to postpone elections until the State had fulfilled its duty to reapportion its legislative districts, which it had not done since 1901 (over 60 years).
What was the outcome of the Baker v Baker case?
Decision. The opinion was finally handed down in March 1962, nearly a year after it was initially argued. The Court split 6 to 2 in ruling that Baker’s case was justiciable, producing, in addition to the opinion of the Court by Justice William J. Brennan, three concurring opinions and two dissenting opinions.
Who is Elianna Spitzer and what is Baker v Carr?
Elianna Spitzer is a legal studies writer and a former Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism research assistant. She has also worked at the Superior Court of San Francisco’s ACCESS Center. Baker v. Carr (1962) was a landmark case concerning re-apportionment and redistricting.
What was the Baker case in Gray v Gray?
The court summarized its Baker holding in a later decision as follows: “Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment limits the authority of a State Legislature in designing the geographical districts from which representatives are chosen either for the State Legislature or for the Federal House of Representatives.” ( Gray v.